August 03, 2012

The bill, it seems, is a no go.  With all the cyber attacks, why did it fail?

  1. It was all sticks, no carrots.  If the government wants to impose regulations and compliance, it should at least have the good sense to offer something to the cyber security community.  For example, Washington could have offered to increase law enforcement resources.
  2. There was little input from the cyber security community.  If you want legislation to succeed, it helps to get the consent of those it will affect.  In this case, we saw the “Washington knows best” dynamic that doesn’t go over well anywhere, especially with security geeks.  At Black Hat, for example, Bruce Schneier talked about the merits and demerits of the bill.  Imagine how much more effective if would have been if he talked about how he helped craft it, in essence, putting his weight behind the bill.  Similarly, it seems every time Obama comes to the Bay Area, it’s for fund raising versus gathering ideas from the Silicon Valley.

 


Authors:

Share:
Share on LinkedIn

Comments

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.